Include regen-stdlib-module-names in regen-all

[nascheme]

BPO	43384
Nosy	@nascheme, @akulakov
PRs	bpo-43384: Run regen-stdlib-module-names from regen-all. #24713

^{Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.}

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = None
closed_at = <Date 2021-07-05.19:07:34.345>
created_at = <Date 2021-03-03.07:08:09.116>
labels = ['type-feature', 'build']
title = 'Include regen-stdlib-module-names in regen-all'
updated_at = <Date 2021-07-05.19:07:34.345>
user = 'https://github.com/nascheme'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2021-07-05.19:07:34.345>
actor = 'nascheme'
assignee = 'none'
closed = True
closed_date = <Date 2021-07-05.19:07:34.345>
closer = 'nascheme'
components = ['Build']
creation = <Date 2021-03-03.07:08:09.116>
creator = 'nascheme'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 43384
keywords = ['patch']
message_count = 2.0
messages = ['388003', '397002']
nosy_count = 2.0
nosy_names = ['nascheme', 'andrei.avk']
pr_nums = ['24713']
priority = 'normal'
resolution = 'rejected'
stage = 'resolved'
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = 'enhancement'
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue43384'
versions = []

[nascheme]

While I was fixing the regen-frozen issue, I noticed it seems unnecessary to have regen-stdlib-module-names separate from regen-all. Maybe Victor knows why it needs to be separate. If it doesn't need to be separate, the CI scripts can be slightly simplified.

[akulakov]

This can be closed based on PR comment by nascheme.