Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add multimap() function similar to map(), but with multiprocessing functionality to the multiprocessing module #88603

Closed
Ryan-Rudes mannequin opened this issue Jun 16, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
3.8 only security fixes 3.9 only security fixes 3.10 only security fixes 3.11 only security fixes stdlib Python modules in the Lib dir type-feature A feature request or enhancement

Comments

@Ryan-Rudes
Copy link
Mannequin

Ryan-Rudes mannequin commented Jun 16, 2021

BPO 44437
Nosy @rhettinger, @Ryan-Rudes
PRs
  • bpo-44437: Add multimap(function, iterable, workers) #26762
  • Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

    Show more details

    GitHub fields:

    assignee = None
    closed_at = <Date 2021-06-16.21:12:20.268>
    created_at = <Date 2021-06-16.19:23:02.460>
    labels = ['3.8', '3.9', '3.10', '3.11', 'type-feature', 'library']
    title = 'Add multimap() function similar to map(), but with multiprocessing functionality to the multiprocessing module'
    updated_at = <Date 2021-06-16.21:12:20.265>
    user = 'https://github.com/Ryan-Rudes'

    bugs.python.org fields:

    activity = <Date 2021-06-16.21:12:20.265>
    actor = 'rhettinger'
    assignee = 'none'
    closed = True
    closed_date = <Date 2021-06-16.21:12:20.268>
    closer = 'rhettinger'
    components = ['Library (Lib)']
    creation = <Date 2021-06-16.19:23:02.460>
    creator = 'Ryan-Rudes'
    dependencies = []
    files = []
    hgrepos = []
    issue_num = 44437
    keywords = ['patch']
    message_count = 1.0
    messages = ['395961']
    nosy_count = 2.0
    nosy_names = ['rhettinger', 'Ryan-Rudes']
    pr_nums = ['26762']
    priority = 'normal'
    resolution = 'rejected'
    stage = 'resolved'
    status = 'closed'
    superseder = None
    type = 'enhancement'
    url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue44437'
    versions = ['Python 3.8', 'Python 3.9', 'Python 3.10', 'Python 3.11']

    @Ryan-Rudes Ryan-Rudes mannequin added topic-tkinter 3.8 only security fixes 3.9 only security fixes 3.10 only security fixes 3.11 only security fixes type-feature A feature request or enhancement stdlib Python modules in the Lib dir and removed topic-tkinter labels Jun 16, 2021
    @rhettinger
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Marking as closed for the reasons mentioned in the PR. I you want to go forward, consider starting a thread on python-ideas.

    @ezio-melotti ezio-melotti transferred this issue from another repository Apr 10, 2022
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    3.8 only security fixes 3.9 only security fixes 3.10 only security fixes 3.11 only security fixes stdlib Python modules in the Lib dir type-feature A feature request or enhancement
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    1 participant