We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
According to the classifiers in setup.cfg, it is licensed under Apache Software License. But the content of LICENSE file is MIT License.
Which one is correct? Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Great question. Thanks for reporting. I double-checked and this issue does not apply to importlib_metadata.
It looks like it was inadvertently reverted to the upstream default license in 8de19cf.
Sorry, something went wrong.
a203c1b
No branches or pull requests
According to the classifiers in setup.cfg, it is licensed under Apache Software License.
But the content of LICENSE file is MIT License.
Which one is correct?
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: