Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mypy not resolving protocol class as callable in check_reverse_op_method (and possible fix) #11595

Open
velsinki opened this issue Nov 22, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
bug mypy got something wrong

Comments

@velsinki
Copy link

Bug Report

I'm writing a custom vector class for a specific type of simulation I'm working on. This class implements, amongst other operations, __add__ and __radd__ operations, with numpy floating point arguments. However, for some reason, Mypy flags a np.floating type as not having a callable __add__ method.

To Reproduce

Minimal example.py:

from __future__ import annotations
import numpy as np

class my_float:

    def __radd__(self, other: np.float32) -> my_float:
        return my_float()

Running mypy example.py:

example.py:6: error: Forward operator "__add__" is not callable
Found 1 error in 1 file (checked 1 source file)

More investigation
At first, I thought this was perhaps a bug in numpy, but I am not convinced. Numpy, even though all arithmetic operators are based on ufuncs written in C, provides accurate static typing stubs for them. Mypy can resolve these correctly:

a = np.float32()
b = np.float32()
reveal_type(a + b)       # Revealed type is "numpy.floating[numpy.typing._32Bit]"

I believe the problem lies in that for the np.floating class and derivatives, __add__ (and other operators) are not directly defined as (overloaded) methods, but hinted as __add__: _FloatOp[_NBit1]

Here,

class _FloatOp(Protocol[_NBit1]):
    @overload
    def __call__(self, __other: bool) -> floating[_NBit1]: ...
    @overload
    def __call__(self, __other: int) -> floating[Union[_NBit1, _NBitInt]]: ...
    @overload
    def __call__(self, __other: float) -> floating[Union[_NBit1, _NBitDouble]]: ...
    @overload
    def __call__(
        self, __other: complex
    ) -> complexfloating[Union[_NBit1, _NBitDouble], Union[_NBit1, _NBitDouble]]: ...
    @overload
    def __call__(
        self, __other: Union[integer[_NBit2], floating[_NBit2]]
    ) -> floating[Union[_NBit1, _NBit2]]: ...

I had a look in more detail in how this results in mypy not resolving the operator as callable, by cloning the current mypy master and digging into it. In the end, I believe the problem lies in the mypy method check_reverse_op_method, more specifically in the call here:

forward_type = self.expr_checker.analyze_external_member_access(forward_name, forward_base,

Instead of returning some function-like variable, it only returns an instance of type:

str(forward_type) = numpy.typing._callable._FloatOp[numpy.typing._32Bit*]

This is different than for example changing in my example.py the argument to other: float, which gives:

str(forward_type) = def (builtins.float) -> builtins.float

The forward_type is used in a call to check_overlapping_op_methods, and since there is no check for isinstance(forward_item, Instance), we end up here in the case of my original example.py:

self.msg.forward_operator_not_callable(forward_name, context)

resulting in the error as in my example.

One (perhaps dirty) fix would be to add a simple test for an instance right after line 1293 in check_overlapping_op_methods and test if it is callable, and resolve that:

if isinstance(forward_item, Instance):
    if forward_item.has_readable_member('__call__'):
        forward_item = self.expr_checker.analyze_external_member_access('__call__',
                                                                        forward_item,
                                                                        context)

This fixes the issue. However, I do not know enough about mypy internals to know why the analyze_external_member_access call does not resolve the (overloaded) __call__ method in the first place. I have tried to get it to return an instance with some non-protocol classes with overloaded __call__ methods, but I cannot easily reproduce this issue.

Any other suggestions? Or is this perhaps an implementation error on the part of Numpy?

Apologies if my issue submission is too long, but since I already did some digging I thought to share it as well.

Your Environment

  • Mypy version used: 0.92
  • Numpy version used: 1.21.4
  • Python version used: 3.9.7
@velsinki velsinki added the bug mypy got something wrong label Nov 22, 2021
@francipvb
Copy link

Hello,

I have this problem with a simpler use case.

I have a pagination class with a generic method that uses a protocol for a callable definition. However, when I supply a method, MyPy expects a class with a __call__ method, not a function.

Something similar occurs with another callable protocol, but this time without generic arguments.

Have a nice day.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug mypy got something wrong
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants