Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

PEP 729 -- Typing governance process #213

Closed
6 of 7 tasks
JelleZijlstra opened this issue Nov 3, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed
6 of 7 tasks

PEP 729 -- Typing governance process #213

JelleZijlstra opened this issue Nov 3, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
PEP Python Enhancement Proposal

Comments

@JelleZijlstra
Copy link
Member

JelleZijlstra commented Nov 3, 2023 •
edited

Please consider PEP 729 -- Typing governance process
https://peps.python.org/pep-0729/

  • The PEP has been discussed in threads listed in its Post-History header
  • The PEP was announced on Discuss (link in Post-History)
  • The PEP includes all relevant Suggested Sections
  • The PEP includes endorsements from the projects/groups/people it helps
  • The PEP has a CODEOWNERS entry

SIG-specific:

  • typing-sig PEPs: link to Guido/Jelle's confirmation that the PEP captures typing-sig discussions/consensus: Jelle here. For the most part, the PEP generated surprisingly little discussion. The main point of contention was around how the spec should work; this is discussed in "Rejected ideas".
  • Packaging PEPs: don't file the issue here, ask the delegate (Paul Moore) on Packaging Discourse
@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra added the PEP Python Enhancement Proposal label Nov 3, 2023
@emilyemorehouse
Copy link
Member

On behalf of the SC, we're pleased to accept this PEP. 🙂

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
PEP Python Enhancement Proposal
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@JelleZijlstra @emilyemorehouse