Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scale on toolbar has insufficient range #10692

Closed
qgib opened this issue Mar 2, 2007 · 7 comments
Closed

Scale on toolbar has insufficient range #10692

qgib opened this issue Mar 2, 2007 · 7 comments
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Map and Legend Related to map or legend rendering

Comments

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor

qgib commented Mar 2, 2007

Author Name: Gavin Macaulay - (Gavin Macaulay -)
Original Redmine Issue: 633

Redmine category:map_canvas
Assignee: Tim Sutton


As of r6747 the 1:xxx scale on the qgis toolbar is now limited to the range of a long variable. This is insufficient for many situations. e.g., load an image, and set the scale to 1:10, then 1:100, 1:1000, etc,. Eventually the displayed scale will change to -2147483648.

In a similar manner, setting scales of less than 1:1 is not possible. If I try to set the scale to 1:0.5, qgis displays it as 1:-2.

I also recall in earlier versions of qgis that if the scale went to something like 1:0.001, it would be displayed at 1000:1. It would be nice for this to be re-introduced.


@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Mar 2, 2007

Author Name: Magnus Homann (@homann)


Tmi said that scale less than 1:1 wasn't supported by Qgis?

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Mar 3, 2007

Author Name: Gavin Macaulay - (Gavin Macaulay -)


Replying to [comment:2 homann]:

One never knows what the user wants to do. Arbitrary limits on the scale are a bad idea.

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Mar 3, 2007

Author Name: Gavin Macaulay - (Gavin Macaulay -)


Qgis has supported scales of less than 1:1 for about 18 months.

I propose that 559a28a (SVN r6748) either be reverted or fixed so that it doesn't remove existing functionality.

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Mar 3, 2007

Author Name: Magnus Homann (@homann)


Just removing it because the UI is not 100% is plain silly. There was two enhacenment request for this feature, and I implemented a first version. I did not expect to get flak for that.

We have about 17 developers, how many of them need to agree on what the UI should look like before we can implement?

Gavin, why don't you tell us what it should look like instead?

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Mar 3, 2007

Author Name: anonymous - (anonymous -)


Hi Guys

Let me apologise as I am probably the cause of this confusion - I told Magnus on IRC that I thought we had decided at one point to support a minimum scale of 1:1. I didnt check my facts by googling IRC etc since I am pretty busy at the moment. IMHO Magnus is adding something nice to QGIS so lets just discuss what the preferred behaviour is.

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Mar 5, 2007

Author Name: Gavin Macaulay - (Gavin Macaulay -)


Range expanded to that of a double in .


  • status_id was changed from Open to Closed
  • resolution was changed from to fixed

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Aug 21, 2009

Author Name: Anónimo (Anónimo)


Milestone Version 0.9 deleted

@qgib qgib added Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Map and Legend Related to map or legend rendering labels May 24, 2019
@qgib qgib closed this as completed May 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Map and Legend Related to map or legend rendering
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant