Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

implement add/del field for Shapefiles #11506

Closed
qgib opened this issue Dec 7, 2008 · 7 comments
Closed

implement add/del field for Shapefiles #11506

qgib opened this issue Dec 7, 2008 · 7 comments

Comments

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor

qgib commented Dec 7, 2008

Author Name: Maciej Sieczka - (Maciej Sieczka -)
Original Redmine Issue: 1446

Assignee: Jürgen Fischer


Now that creation of new fields in an existing DBF table via OGR is possible r1 please implement this functionality in table editor fro Shapefiles.

r1http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2672


@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Dec 7, 2008

Author Name: Jürgen Fischer (@jef-n)


OGR still doesn't support deletion of fields.

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Dec 8, 2008

Author Name: Martin Dobias (@wonder-sk)


Replying to [comment:1 jef]:

OGR still doesn't support deletion of fields.

Indeed it doesn't, however there's a patch pending:

http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2671

Martin

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Dec 15, 2008

Author Name: Marco Hugentobler (@mhugent)


One issue I had with this patch: after commiting the added fields, they where not visible in the attribute table and with the info tools. I had to remove and reopen the layer to have the fields in the attribute table.
Would it be possible to reopen the OGR datasource inside the ogr provider after adding fields?

Thanks,
Marco

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Dec 17, 2008

Author Name: Marco Hugentobler (@mhugent)


I'm suggesting to push this to 1.0.1 to have more time for testing

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Jan 19, 2009

Author Name: Paolo Cavallini (@pcav)


Would this be the right time to apply it to trunk?

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Jan 19, 2009

Author Name: Jürgen Fischer (@jef-n)


Replying to [comment:6 pcav]:

Would this be the right time to apply it to trunk?

applied in 98d9d51 (SVN r9983)


  • status_id was changed from Open to Closed
  • resolution was changed from to fixed

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Aug 21, 2009

Author Name: Anónimo (Anónimo)


Milestone Version 1.0.1 deleted

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant