Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

different built-in tools calculate inconsistent polygon areas #14197

Closed
qgib opened this issue Sep 1, 2011 · 10 comments
Closed

different built-in tools calculate inconsistent polygon areas #14197

qgib opened this issue Sep 1, 2011 · 10 comments
Labels
Feature Request Projections/Transformations Related to coordinate reference systems or coordinate transformation

Comments

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor

qgib commented Sep 1, 2011

Author Name: Alister Hood (@AlisterH)
Original Redmine Issue: 4252

Redmine category:projection_support
Assignee: Magnus Homann


  • When using the "measure area" tool, there is an "ellipsoidal" checkbox option. If this is unchecked, a slightly different area is reported, which I think I have seen called the "planimetric" area.
  • The "Identify results" for polygons include a "Derived" area. This area is the "ellipsoidal" area.
  • The field calculator can also report the area of a polygon. This area is always the "planimetric" area.

I think this behaviour should be tidied up:

  • either ellipsoidal or planimetric (I'm not sure which one) measurements should be default everywhere.
  • assuming both types of measurement are actually useful, then it should be possible everywhere to use either type. This could be done by a single global or project preference which controls the results for all three tools, or it could be implemented separately for each tool. I don't know which approach would be best.
@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Dec 10, 2011

Author Name: Paolo Cavallini (@pcav)


See also #14348 and #14529

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Dec 16, 2011

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)


  • fixed_version_id was configured as Version 1.7.4

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Mar 10, 2012

Author Name: Alister Hood (@AlisterH)


Also see #13356 I think.

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Apr 15, 2012

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)


  • fixed_version_id was changed from Version 1.7.4 to Version 2.0.0

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented May 28, 2012

Author Name: Alister Hood (@AlisterH)


Note that the "export geometry columns" feature in ftools is now capable of calculating ellipsoidal areas, so I guess people should be encouraged to use that tool. It is a lot slower though.

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Aug 28, 2012

Author Name: Magnus Homann (@homann)


  • assigned_to_id was configured as Magnus Homann

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Sep 4, 2012

Author Name: Magnus Homann (@homann)


All except field calculator should be consitent now. Work is ongoing.

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Sep 16, 2012

Author Name: Alister Hood (@AlisterH)


Also see #12462 and possibly #13182

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Oct 6, 2012

Author Name: Pirmin Kalberer (Pirmin Kalberer)


  • fixed_version_id was changed from Version 2.0.0 to Future Release - Nice to have

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Feb 15, 2016

Author Name: Nyall Dawson (@nyalldawson)


Fixed in changeset "4094bae960a8521eca6dfe281408ae2e9ad773be".


  • status_id was changed from Open to Closed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature Request Projections/Transformations Related to coordinate reference systems or coordinate transformation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant