Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NoData value should not be considered when classifying a raster #15005

Closed
qgib opened this issue Apr 2, 2012 · 3 comments
Closed

NoData value should not be considered when classifying a raster #15005

qgib opened this issue Apr 2, 2012 · 3 comments
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Rasters Related to general raster layer handling (not specific data formats)

Comments

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor

qgib commented Apr 2, 2012

Author Name: mattwigway . (mattwigway .)
Original Redmine Issue: 5285
Affected QGIS version: master
Redmine category:rasters


When classifying a raster or when calculating min and max, the NoData value (on the transparency tab) should be ignored. For instance, I have a raster that has values between -30 and 130 as well as NoData values of -32768. Min, max and the classifier stretch the raster all the way to -32768.

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Apr 3, 2012

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)


probably duplicate of #11440. Please check and confirm.


  • status_id was changed from Open to Feedback

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Apr 3, 2012

Author Name: mattwigway . (mattwigway .)


You're right, sorry 'bout that. I evidently don't have permission to close it, can someone go ahead and do that?

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Apr 3, 2012

Author Name: Paolo Cavallini (@pcav)


  • resolution was changed from to duplicate
  • status_id was changed from Feedback to Closed

@qgib qgib added Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Rasters Related to general raster layer handling (not specific data formats) labels May 24, 2019
@qgib qgib closed this as completed May 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Rasters Related to general raster layer handling (not specific data formats)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant