Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

When using gdalwarp in batch mode, extensions of outfile are not correctly defined #15305

Closed
qgib opened this issue Jun 20, 2012 · 4 comments
Closed

When using gdalwarp in batch mode, extensions of outfile are not correctly defined #15305

qgib opened this issue Jun 20, 2012 · 4 comments
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Processing Relating to QGIS Processing framework or individual Processing algorithms
Milestone
Future Release - ...

Comments

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor

qgib commented Jun 20, 2012

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)
Original Redmine Issue: 5830
Affected QGIS version: master
Redmine category:processing/gdal

If the input folder is full of ecw files (example), then the output will be tiff files as expected, but they have the .ecw extension.
@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Dec 31, 2012

Author Name: Paolo Cavallini (@pcav)

  • assigned_to_id was changed from Giuseppe Sucameli to anonymous

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Jun 12, 2014

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)

  • version was changed from 1.8.0 to master
  • fixed_version_id was changed from Version 2.0.0 to Future Release - Lower Priority
  • assigned_to_id removed anonymous

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Jan 2, 2017

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)

  • category_id was changed from GDAL Tools to Processing/GDAL

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Feb 7, 2017

Author Name: Alexander Bruy (@alexbruy)

Should be fixed in Processing front-end. Please reopen if necessary

  • status_id was changed from Open to Closed
  • resolution was changed from to fixed/implemented

@qgib qgib added Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Processing Relating to QGIS Processing framework or individual Processing algorithms labels May 24, 2019
@qgib qgib added this to the Future Release - Lower Priority milestone May 24, 2019
@qgib qgib closed this as completed May 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Processing Relating to QGIS Processing framework or individual Processing algorithms
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Future Release - Lower Priority
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@qgib