Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"number of candidates" setting is ignored in composer maps #15997

Closed
qgib opened this issue Dec 12, 2012 · 3 comments
Closed

"number of candidates" setting is ignored in composer maps #15997

qgib opened this issue Dec 12, 2012 · 3 comments
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Labeling Related to QGIS map labeling

Comments

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor

qgib commented Dec 12, 2012

Author Name: Alister Hood (@AlisterH)
Original Redmine Issue: 6864
Affected QGIS version: master
Redmine category:labelling


In the "automated placement settings" of the new labelling system, it seems* that at least for point layers, the "Number of candidates" setting is only applied in the main map canvas, not in composer maps.

I have tested with 1.8 and a version of master that is a couple of weeks old (45a933a). I can't test the latest master at the moment as I am kind of cut off from the world.


  • If the option "show candidates" is enabled, then the main map canvas shows the number of candidates that is specified, but composer maps always show 8 candidates.
@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Dec 12, 2012

Author Name: Alister Hood (@AlisterH)


I'm setting the "priority" to low because I think the "automated placement settings" aren't really expected to be used by end users.

Note that there are some other issues with the "automated placement settings", for example

  • If "show candidates" is enabled, then the candidates are shown in the composer, but are not printed. Is this a deliberate design decision?
  • The labelling of the different search methods seems unclear:
Chain (fast)
Popmusic Tabu
Popmusic Chain
Popmusic Tabu Chain
FALP (fastest)

Is this an ordered list, so the "fast" chain method is really the slowest method? Or are the three Popmusic methods slower than it?


  • priority_id was changed from Normal to Low

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Jun 17, 2013

Author Name: Alister Hood (@AlisterH)


that at least for point layers,

I just tested with current master and it occurs with polygon layers to. I haven't bothered testing with polyline layers.

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Oct 10, 2016

Author Name: Nyall Dawson (@nyalldawson)


Should not be an issue with current releases, please re-open if you can reproduce.


  • resolution was changed from to fixed/implemented
  • status_id was changed from Open to Closed

@qgib qgib added Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Labeling Related to QGIS map labeling labels May 24, 2019
@qgib qgib closed this as completed May 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Labeling Related to QGIS map labeling
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant