Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Distance matrix wrong under processing #17747

Closed
qgib opened this issue Nov 20, 2013 · 8 comments
Closed

Distance matrix wrong under processing #17747

qgib opened this issue Nov 20, 2013 · 8 comments
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Processing Relating to QGIS Processing framework or individual Processing algorithms

Comments

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor

qgib commented Nov 20, 2013

Author Name: Jonathan Moules (Jonathan Moules)
Original Redmine Issue: 9102
Affected QGIS version: master
Redmine category:processing/qgis
Assignee: Victor Olaya


New description:

N x T distance matrix is created without errors in Processing but output is wrong, see attached files.


Old description:

Using the 2.1 weekly

See #17745 for data/settings.

With "Standard" I get an error:
"Builtin_fnction_or_method" object has no attribute "getitem"

==============

With Linear/summary I get a popup "select datum transformations for layer distance matrix":
a) What does this mean?
b) My cursor remains "busy", even though I seem to be able to use it. If I "cancel" this dialog, only one result exists in the matrix that was created.


@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Nov 21, 2013

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)


I also see this issue with the standard N x T distance matrix.

The linear distance matrix seems to works ok.

The summary distance matrix works only if there are selected points. The expected behavior is to use all points if no one is selected and use just the selected points, if some is selected.

Moreover in the summary distance matrix the column MIN is filled with all zeroes, while the tool in the vector menu fills it with the correct values.


  • category_id was configured as 61

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Oct 4, 2014

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)


  • project_id was changed from 78 to 17
  • version was configured as 2.4.0
  • assigned_to_id was configured as Victor Olaya
  • category_id removed 61
  • crashes_corrupts_data was configured as 0

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Oct 4, 2014

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)


  • category_id was configured as Processing/QGIS

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Apr 27, 2015

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)


  • 8645 was configured as dmftools.csv
  • version was changed from 2.4.0 to master
  • fixed_version_id was configured as Version 2.8.2
  • subject was changed from Distance matrix issues to Distance matrix wrong under processing
  • 8644 was configured as dmprocessing.csv

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented May 14, 2015

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)


  • fixed_version_id was changed from Version 2.8.2 to Version 2.10

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Nov 7, 2015

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)


  • fixed_version_id removed Version 2.10

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Sep 26, 2016

Author Name: Victor Olaya (@volaya)


All 3 methods seem to be working fine. No errors raised, and results seems correct.

Looks like it is already fixed. Could you please recheck and confirm?

Thanks!

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Feb 7, 2017

Author Name: Alexander Bruy (@alexbruy)


Closed for the lack of feedback. Please reopen if necessary.


  • resolution was changed from to fixed/implemented
  • status_id was changed from Open to Closed

@qgib qgib added Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Processing Relating to QGIS Processing framework or individual Processing algorithms labels May 24, 2019
@qgib qgib closed this as completed May 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Processing Relating to QGIS Processing framework or individual Processing algorithms
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant