Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integer64 fields not supported by several processing functions #22734

Closed
qgib opened this issue May 5, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

Integer64 fields not supported by several processing functions #22734

qgib opened this issue May 5, 2016 · 1 comment
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Processing Relating to QGIS Processing framework or individual Processing algorithms
Milestone

Comments

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor

qgib commented May 5, 2016

Author Name: Lene Fischer (@LeneFischer)
Original Redmine Issue: 14777
Affected QGIS version: 2.14.2
Redmine category:processing/qgis
Assignee: Victor Olaya


Using "Processing"> "Basic statistic for nummeric fields" and "Processing"> "Statistic by category" only fields with Integer (32bit) and Decimal are available in the drop down "Fields to calculate on"

Integer64 (qlonglong) fields are not shown.

Version 2.14.2/Windows 7-64 bit

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented May 8, 2016

Author Name: Alexander Bruy (@alexbruy)


Fixed in changeset "f1e6d8731b67b47ce44dc03c5e4d9b7dfe676a0f".


  • status_id was changed from Open to Closed

@qgib qgib added Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Processing Relating to QGIS Processing framework or individual Processing algorithms labels May 25, 2019
@qgib qgib added this to the Version 2.14 milestone May 25, 2019
@qgib qgib closed this as completed May 25, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Processing Relating to QGIS Processing framework or individual Processing algorithms
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant