Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wrong "Show feature count" on a shapefile layer with logically deleted record #23657

Closed
qgib opened this issue Oct 20, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter!
Milestone

Comments

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor

qgib commented Oct 20, 2016

Author Name: Sandro Santilli (@strk)
Original Redmine Issue: 15735
Affected QGIS version: 2.14.7
Redmine category:unknown


Loading a shapefile with logically-deleted records in the DBF includes the logically-deleted records in the count shown by "Show feature count" (right click on the legend item). Opening the attributes table for the layer correctly omits the logically-deleted records.

Test file can be found attached to this PostGIS ticket:
https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/3645

Not sure which "Category" to assign this bug to.


Related issue(s): #23661 (relates)
Redmine related issue(s): 15739


@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Apr 30, 2017

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)


  • easy_fix was configured as 0
  • regression was configured as 0

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Sep 22, 2017

Author Name: Jürgen Fischer (@jef-n)


  • category_id was configured as Unknown

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Mar 9, 2019

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)


End of life notice: QGIS 2.18 LTR

Source:
http://blog.qgis.org/2019/03/09/end-of-life-notice-qgis-2-18-ltr/

QGIS 3.4 has recently become our new Long Term Release (LTR) version. This is a major step in our history – a long term release version based on the massive updates, library upgrades and improvements that we carried out in the course of the 2.x to 3x upgrade cycle.

We strongly encourage all users who are currently using QGIS 2.18 LTR as their preferred QGIS release to migrate to QGIS 3.4. This new LTR version will receive regular bugfixes for at least one year. It also includes hundreds of new functions, usability improvements, bugfixes, and other goodies. See the relevant changelogs for a good sampling of all the new features that have gone into version 3.4

Most plugins have been either migrated or incorporated into the core QGIS code base.

We strongly discourage the continued use of QGIS 2.18 LTR as it is now officially unsupported, which means we’ll not provide any bug fix releases for it.

You should also note that we intend to close all bug tickets referring to the now obsolete LTR version. Original reporters will receive a notification of the ticket closure and are encouraged to check whether the issue persists in the new LTR, in which case they should reopen the ticket.

If you would like to better understand the QGIS release roadmap, check out our roadmap page! It outlines the schedule for upcoming releases and will help you plan your deployment of QGIS into an operational environment.

The development of QGIS 3.4 LTR has been made possible by the work of hundreds of volunteers, by the investments of companies, professionals, and administrations, and by continuous donations and financial support from many of you. We sincerely thank you all and encourage you to collaborate and support the project even more, for the long term improvement and sustainability of the QGIS project.


  • resolution was changed from to end of life
  • status_id was changed from Open to Closed

@qgib qgib closed this as completed Mar 9, 2019
@qgib qgib added the Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! label May 25, 2019
@qgib qgib added this to the Version 2.14 milestone May 25, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter!
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant