Range widget: ridiculously large minimum and maximum values

[qgib]

Author Name: Andreas Neumann (@andreasneumann)
Original Redmine Issue: 16826
Affected QGIS version: master
Redmine category:edit_widget

---

For an attribute with a Postgis data type of numeric(9.3) the range edit widgets suggests ridiculously large minimum and maximum values:

Min: 179769000000000006323030492138942643493033036433685336215410983289126434148906289940615299632196609445533816320312774433484859900046491141051651091672734470972759941382582304802812882753059262973637182942535982636884444611376868582636745405553206881859340916340092953230149901406738427651121855107737424232448

Max:
179769000000000006323030492138942643493033036433685336215410983289126434148906289940615299632196609445533816320312774433484859900046491141051651091672734470972759941382582304802812882753059262973637182942535982636884444611376868582636745405553206881859340916340092953230149901406738427651121855107737424232448

In my opinion, something more reasonable should be piced as defaults.

---

• range_widget_data_type_zukm.png (Andreas Neumann)
• range_widget_large_min_max_values.png (Andreas Neumann)

[qgib]

Author Name: Andreas Neumann (@andreasneumann)

---

Andreas Neumann wrote:

For an attribute with a Postgis data type of numeric(9.3) the range edit widgets suggests ridiculously large minimum and maximum values:

Min: 179769000000000006323030492138942643493033036433685336215410983289126434148906289940615299632196609445533816320312774433484859900046491141051651091672734470972759941382582304802812882753059262973637182942535982636884444611376868582636745405553206881859340916340092953230149901406738427651121855107737424232448

Max:
179769000000000006323030492138942643493033036433685336215410983289126434148906289940615299632196609445533816320312774433484859900046491141051651091672734470972759941382582304802812882753059262973637182942535982636884444611376868582636745405553206881859340916340092953230149901406738427651121855107737424232448

In my opinion, something more reasonable should be chosen as defaults.

[qgib]

Author Name: Andreas Neumann (@andreasneumann)

---

• subject was changed from Range widget: ridulously large minimum and maximum values to Range widget: ridiculously large minimum and maximum values

[qgib]

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)

---

Please check if this issue is still valid on QGIS 3.4.5 or 3.6.

---

• status_id was changed from Open to Feedback

[tschuettenberg]

This issue is still true for QGIS 3.4.12, 3.10.9 and 3.14.1.

[Pedro-Murteira]

Still valid on QGIS 3.22.3.