Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Interpolation Algorithm] Missing the option X and Y cellsize #26444

Closed
qgib opened this issue Mar 27, 2018 · 6 comments
Closed

[Interpolation Algorithm] Missing the option X and Y cellsize #26444

qgib opened this issue Mar 27, 2018 · 6 comments
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! High Priority Processing Relating to QGIS Processing framework or individual Processing algorithms Regression Something which used to work, but doesn't anymore

Comments

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor

qgib commented Mar 27, 2018

Author Name: João Gaspar (@jonnyforestGIS)
Original Redmine Issue: 18556
Affected QGIS version: 3.5(master)
Redmine category:processing/core


The interpolation module before QGIS 3.0.0 have two options to define the size of output raster in the dialog:
or Cellsize X / Cellsize Y

Now in processing framework only have: Number of Rows / Columns

See attachments.

Regards
João



Related issue(s): #27526 (duplicates)
Redmine related issue(s): 19701


@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Dec 24, 2018

Author Name: Alexander Bruy (@alexbruy)


@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Dec 28, 2018

Author Name: Paolo Cavallini (@pcav)


Could you please check again on current release?
Thanks.


  • assigned_to_id removed Victor Olaya

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Dec 28, 2018

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)


Paolo Cavallini wrote:

Could you please check again on current release?
Thanks.

still true (rendering the tool barely usable).


  • version was changed from 3.0.0 to 3.5(master)

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Dec 28, 2018

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)


  • priority_id was changed from Normal to High
  • operating_system was changed from WIndows 7 64-bits to

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Dec 30, 2018

Author Name: Alexander Bruy (@alexbruy)


Applied in changeset 84d155e.


  • status_id was changed from Open to Closed
  • done_ratio was changed from 0 to 100

@qgib qgib closed this as completed Dec 30, 2018
@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Dec 30, 2018

Author Name: Alexander Bruy (@alexbruy)


  • resolution was changed from to fixed/implemented

@qgib qgib added Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! High Priority Processing Relating to QGIS Processing framework or individual Processing algorithms Regression Something which used to work, but doesn't anymore labels May 25, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! High Priority Processing Relating to QGIS Processing framework or individual Processing algorithms Regression Something which used to work, but doesn't anymore
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant