Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Results of intersects geotraitement tools are not the same between 2.18 and 3.2.3 #27732

Closed
qgib opened this issue Sep 21, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! High Priority Regression Something which used to work, but doesn't anymore Vectors Related to general vector layer handling (not specific data formats)

Comments

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor

qgib commented Sep 21, 2018

Author Name: Florent LUQUET (Florent LUQUET)
Original Redmine Issue: 19908
Affected QGIS version: 3.2.3
Redmine category:vectors


The tool "Select by location" into "Processing Toolbox" responds a wrong result on the 3.2.3 version. See below the attachements images.
The data are polygons (not multi polygons) with the same CRS.


@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Sep 21, 2018

Author Name: Nyall Dawson (@nyalldawson)


Please attach the sample data used.


  • status_id was changed from Open to Feedback

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Sep 21, 2018

Author Name: Florent LUQUET (Florent LUQUET)


Ok. Data into a geopackage attachement. Thanks


  • 13342 was configured as indicateur_3.gpkg

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Sep 23, 2018

Author Name: Nyall Dawson (@nyalldawson)


I've investigated and the cause of this issue is that the geometries in dalle_litto_3d are all invalid -- the polygon rings are not closed. This also causes issues with other QGIS tools, e.g. you can't click to select polygons in this layer or use the identify tool on them. The solution is to run the "repair geometries" algorithm over this layer to fix the geometries.

I'm curious how this layer was built though -- if it was the result of a QGIS algorithm or operation then that needs fixing to output valid polygons.

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Dec 27, 2018

Author Name: Nyall Dawson (@nyalldawson)


  • resolution was changed from to no timely feedback
  • status_id was changed from Feedback to Closed

@qgib qgib closed this as completed Dec 27, 2018
@qgib qgib added Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! High Priority Vectors Related to general vector layer handling (not specific data formats) Regression Something which used to work, but doesn't anymore labels May 25, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! High Priority Regression Something which used to work, but doesn't anymore Vectors Related to general vector layer handling (not specific data formats)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant