Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[processing] no cell size option for IDW interpolation alg #27936

Closed
qgib opened this issue Oct 15, 2018 · 6 comments
Closed

[processing] no cell size option for IDW interpolation alg #27936

qgib opened this issue Oct 15, 2018 · 6 comments
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Processing Relating to QGIS Processing framework or individual Processing algorithms

Comments

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor

qgib commented Oct 15, 2018

Author Name: Saber Razmjooei (@saberraz)
Original Redmine Issue: 20114
Affected QGIS version: 3.3(master)
Redmine category:processing/qgis


Not sure if it is a feature request or a bug!

In QGIS 2.18 interpolation plugin, user can set either the cell size or no. columns/rows. But in master, the IDW Interpolation which is the closest to the plugin lacks cell size option.


Related issue(s): #27526 (relates)
Redmine related issue(s): 19701


@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Oct 15, 2018

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)


"Duplicate" of #27526 ?
Both tools are almost unusable without a parameter for output resolution (pixel size).


  • status_id was changed from Open to Feedback

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Oct 15, 2018

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)


@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Oct 15, 2018

Author Name: Saber Razmjooei (@saberraz)


Hi Gio, they are two different algs. But I agree they are similar issues. As long as there is a note for devs not to forget this tool, happy to mark it duplicate and hence closing.

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Oct 15, 2018

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)


Saber Razmjooei wrote:

Hi Gio, they are two different algs. But I agree they are similar issues. As long as there is a note for devs not to forget this tool, happy to mark it duplicate and hence closing.

that is why I wrote "duplicate" in between quotes ;)

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Dec 30, 2018

Author Name: Alexander Bruy (@alexbruy)


Applied in changeset 84d155e.


  • done_ratio was changed from 0 to 100
  • status_id was changed from Feedback to Closed

@qgib qgib closed this as completed Dec 30, 2018
@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Dec 30, 2018

Author Name: Alexander Bruy (@alexbruy)


  • resolution was changed from to fixed/implemented

@qgib qgib added Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Processing Relating to QGIS Processing framework or individual Processing algorithms labels May 25, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Processing Relating to QGIS Processing framework or individual Processing algorithms
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant