You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for sharing the code of the wonderful work!
I had tried to test the code with pre-trained weight for ReSynthedata provided in the link in Readme. With the default configuration setting, there is a dimension mismatch between the pre-trained weight and the defined network. Specifically, for unet_posefeat defined by this module, UnetNoCond7DS the layer upconvC5 should have input channel size as 256. However, in the pre-trained model, its dimension is 384 which yields dimension mismatch error during loading that model like below.
Is there any way to fix this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey guys! @fishfishson is right: my latest commit fixed a bug in the original code (= where all the pre-trained checkpoints are based on, also = the model that are generates the quantitative results in the paper). So this fix makes the architecture not compatible with the previous checkpoints. However I've verified that fixing the bug doesn't significantly change the model's performance (the concrete quantitative results are also slightly subject to the random seeds on each machine). So you can either checkout to an earlier commit e.g. a05404d which is compatible with the pre-trained models; or just use the latest commit and re-train the model.
Thanks for sharing the code of the wonderful work!
I had tried to test the code with pre-trained weight for ReSynthedata provided in the link in Readme. With the default configuration setting, there is a dimension mismatch between the pre-trained weight and the defined network. Specifically, for
unet_posefeat
defined by this module,UnetNoCond7DS
the layerupconvC5
should have input channel size as 256. However, in the pre-trained model, its dimension is 384 which yields dimension mismatch error during loading that model like below.Is there any way to fix this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: