You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, in the template_mesh_uv.obj, there are five vertices are registered on the UV positions that have been occupied by other vertices, i.e. there are five pairs of UV points having identical coordinates. I think the UV positional map should exhibit an exclusive vertex-UVcoords relationship. How do you process this redundancy to generate the positional map properly?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, yes this is acceptable. In the uv mesh, each 'vt' is the image-plane coordinate; in an uv map with a large enough resolution (let's say infinite), each vt should be mapped to a unique pixel; however with a more practical resolution (128, 256 etc), it can happen that the coordinate of a vertex is not an integer, and hence rounded to its nearest integer coordinate. So there are cases where many vertices are mapped to the same pixel.
Hello, in the template_mesh_uv.obj, there are five vertices are registered on the UV positions that have been occupied by other vertices, i.e. there are five pairs of UV points having identical coordinates. I think the UV positional map should exhibit an exclusive vertex-UVcoords relationship. How do you process this redundancy to generate the positional map properly?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: