RPMs are built with an non-standard group

[jrha]

We currently have the group set to "quattor", we should probably consider changing the group to something like Applications/System, which seems to be the best fit out of the standard groups.

Will remove one more rpmlint warning.

As originally discussed in quattor/LC#14.

[jrha]

Valid groups to choose from can be found in /usr/share/doc/rpm-*/GROUPS, the list has not changed for a long time (since Redhat 9?):

Amusements/Games
Amusements/Graphics
Applications/Archiving
Applications/Communications
Applications/Databases
Applications/Editors
Applications/Emulators
Applications/Engineering
Applications/File
Applications/Internet
Applications/Multimedia
Applications/Productivity
Applications/Publishing
Applications/System
Applications/Text
Development/Debuggers
Development/Languages
Development/Libraries
Development/System
Development/Tools
Documentation
System Environment/Base
System Environment/Daemons
System Environment/Kernel
System Environment/Libraries
System Environment/Shells
User Interface/Desktops
User Interface/X
User Interface/X Hardware Support

[jrha]

I've had a look at which groups some other configuration management tools use for RPMs:

• ansible - Development/Libraries.
• bcfg2 - Applications/System and System Environment/Daemons (for server).
• cfengine - System Environment/Base.
• salt - System Environment/Daemons.
• puppet - System Environment/Base.

So definitely System something...

[stdweird]

i vote for System Environment/Base, seems most related