-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
implement BBR congestion control #341
Comments
When will be quic-go support BBR congestion control? |
It's still on our list, but we have a lot of higher-priority issues at the moment. |
is BBR implemented in any quic-go branch now? Thanks a lot. |
No, and we're currently not planning to implement it anytime soon. |
Got it. Thanks. |
I do not know why this thing is not on the top list. Bbr is so critical in quic cc |
any news on add it to quic-go? |
There’s no need to regularly ping us on this issue. It will be updated once we start working on it. |
Any news on this ? |
It's been almost 3 years... |
#3417 (comment) still stands |
Update on BBR: We're not planning to implement BBR in quic-go. Over the years, BBR has been shown to not be the silver bullet to solve all of our performance problems. BBR remains a highly complex algorithm with an enormous set of magic configuration values. It has also not seen the widespread adoption that one might have expected after BBR's initial introduction. In the mean time, different congestion controller algorithms have been explored by the congestion control community, with promising results. quic-go might experiment with those at some point in the future. Until then, there are lots of improvements outside of congestion control that will have a significant performance impact, for example #3526, #2482, #3563. |
BBRv3 support is now tracked in #4565. |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: