You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current transport draft only discusses minimum MTU. However, a large MTU drains resources on the receiving end and could lead DoS attacks on validation of invalid very large packets. IPv6 has a limit of 64K, but apparently there can also be gigabyte sized jumbograms. Futher, this adds an implicit dependency on IPv6 that might be overlooked when adapting QUIC to other transports.
A receiver can always drop large data grams and thus force a MTU limit, but perhaps some text is needed to make this explicit?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current transport draft only discusses minimum MTU. However, a large MTU drains resources on the receiving end and could lead DoS attacks on validation of invalid very large packets. IPv6 has a limit of 64K, but apparently there can also be gigabyte sized jumbograms. Futher, this adds an implicit dependency on IPv6 that might be overlooked when adapting QUIC to other transports.
A receiver can always drop large data grams and thus force a MTU limit, but perhaps some text is needed to make this explicit?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: