Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Section 3.1 -> Section 4 ? #3707

Closed
martinthomson opened this issue Jun 1, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3710
Closed

Section 3.1 -> Section 4 ? #3707

martinthomson opened this issue Jun 1, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3710
Labels
-recovery editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus.
Projects
Late Stage Processing

Comments

@martinthomson
Copy link
Member

Section 3 has just one subsection, which goes into detail about how QUIC is similar and different than TCP. This might be better as its own top-level section.

I was always taught to avoid a) sections that only subsections and no text of their own, b) sections that have precisely one subsection, c) lists with fewer than 3 items in them.
@martinthomson martinthomson added editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. -recovery labels Jun 1, 2020
@larseggert larseggert added this to Triage in Late Stage Processing via automation Jun 1, 2020
@larseggert larseggert moved this from Triage to Editorial Issues in Late Stage Processing Jun 1, 2020
@janaiyengar janaiyengar mentioned this issue Jun 1, 2020
Merged
Late Stage Processing automation moved this from Editorial Issues to Issue Handled Jun 9, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
-recovery editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus.
Projects
Late Stage Processing
  
Issue Handled
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Promote section 3.1 to its own section quicwg/base-drafts
1 participant
@martinthomson