Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Erik Kline's Transport Comment 5 #4517

Closed
LPardue opened this issue Jan 6, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

Erik Kline's Transport Comment 5 #4517

LPardue opened this issue Jan 6, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
-transport editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. iesg An issue raised during IESG review.

Comments

@LPardue
Copy link
Member

LPardue commented Jan 6, 2021

Erik Kline said:

[ section 19.3.1 ]

  • This seems intricate enough that it might be nice if there were an
    Appendix (A.5?) section walking through an example computation or two.
@LPardue LPardue added -transport iesg An issue raised during IESG review. labels Jan 6, 2021
@LPardue LPardue added this to the transport-iesg milestone Jan 6, 2021
@martinthomson
Copy link
Member

This request did come up early on, but it turns out to be something that is harder to get wrong than it seems. Of course, people often do get this wrong, but interop reveals issues almost immediately.

We already passed on doing this. We sat on an open issue for this exact request for a long time with nothing forthcoming, so it would be surprising to see a contribution now. I'm not personally inclined to propose something, but would welcome a contribution if someone wanted to invest the time in providing a short example (it need not be an appendix, a single paragraph might do, if only to provide a test case).

@ekline
Copy link

ekline commented Jan 7, 2021

Fair enough!

@LPardue
Copy link
Member Author

LPardue commented Jan 8, 2021

@ekline appears satisfied with Martin's response. There's is small window of opportunity but I'm pessimitic.

I'm proposing we close with no action if we have seen nothing by the time editors have addressed other comments and are ready to release draft 34.

@larseggert larseggert added this to Triage in Late Stage Processing via automation Jan 11, 2021
@larseggert larseggert added the editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. label Jan 12, 2021
@project-bot project-bot bot moved this from Triage to Editorial Issues in Late Stage Processing Jan 12, 2021
Late Stage Processing automation moved this from Editorial Issues to Issue Handled Jan 12, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-transport editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. iesg An issue raised during IESG review.
Projects
Late Stage Processing
  
Issue Handled
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants