Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Éric Vyncke's Invariants Comment 3 #4548

Closed
LPardue opened this issue Jan 6, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Éric Vyncke's Invariants Comment 3 #4548

LPardue opened this issue Jan 6, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
-invariants editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. iesg An issue raised during IESG review.

Comments

@LPardue
Copy link
Member

LPardue commented Jan 6, 2021

Éric Vyncke said:

-- Section 1 --
Are we really sure that QUIC will always between TWO endpoints ? I.e., no
multicast at all ?

@LPardue LPardue added -invariants iesg An issue raised during IESG review. labels Jan 6, 2021
@LPardue LPardue added this to the invariants-iesg milestone Jan 6, 2021
@martinthomson
Copy link
Member

No. But this is the definition we have.

It might be possible to move to a multi-party protocol. Equally, it might not be a good idea. In any case, we can deal with that if it happens.

My proposal is no change in response to this comment.

@MikeBishop
Copy link
Contributor

Is there a multi-party TCP?

@larseggert larseggert added this to Triage in Late Stage Processing via automation Jan 11, 2021
@larseggert larseggert added the editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. label Jan 12, 2021
@project-bot project-bot bot moved this from Triage to Editorial Issues in Late Stage Processing Jan 12, 2021
Late Stage Processing automation moved this from Editorial Issues to Issue Handled Jan 12, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-invariants editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. iesg An issue raised during IESG review.
Projects
Late Stage Processing
  
Issue Handled
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants