Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Éric Vyncke's Recovery Comment 2 #4589

Closed
LPardue opened this issue Jan 6, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

Éric Vyncke's Recovery Comment 2 #4589

LPardue opened this issue Jan 6, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
-recovery editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. iesg An issue raised during IESG review.
Milestone

Comments

@LPardue
Copy link
Member

LPardue commented Jan 6, 2021

Éric Vyncke said:

-- Abstract --
Should the QUIC version be specified ?

@LPardue LPardue added -recovery iesg An issue raised during IESG review. labels Jan 6, 2021
@LPardue LPardue added this to the recovery-iesg milestone Jan 6, 2021
@martinthomson
Copy link
Member

I'm going to say no, at least at the level of the abstract. And I think that the reference to -transport suffices elsewhere also.

@larseggert larseggert added this to Triage in Late Stage Processing via automation Jan 11, 2021
@larseggert
Copy link
Member

I'm reading this as "close with no action".

@larseggert larseggert added the editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. label Jan 12, 2021
@project-bot project-bot bot moved this from Triage to Editorial Issues in Late Stage Processing Jan 12, 2021
@janaiyengar
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, no action, since the reference makes the version of QUIC clear.

Late Stage Processing automation moved this from Editorial Issues to Issue Handled Jan 12, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-recovery editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. iesg An issue raised during IESG review.
Projects
Late Stage Processing
  
Issue Handled
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants