Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

latest_rtt should be defined as a "variable of interest" #539

Closed
larseggert opened this issue May 19, 2017 · 0 comments
Closed

latest_rtt should be defined as a "variable of interest" #539

larseggert opened this issue May 19, 2017 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
-recovery editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus.

Comments

@larseggert
Copy link
Member

latest_rtt is mentioned in the definition of time_reordering_fraction in Section 3.2.2, but isn't itself defined anywhere. However, DetectLostPackets() uses it.

My guess is that it is basically the same as the rtt_sample variable computed as a side effect in the pseudo code for OnAckReceived(). Should rtt_sample be replaced with latest_rtt here, and latest_rtt be defined as a variable?

@larseggert larseggert added editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. -recovery labels May 19, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-recovery editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants