@MichaelChirico I don't think we should give a lint here. In my opinion this is a false positive, as there is no way an implicit return is given.
My first implementation handled this accordingly. Maybe we could do that again.
Originally posted by @MEO265 in #2271 (comment)
My first implementation handled this accordingly. Maybe we could do that again.
Originally posted by @MEO265 in #2271 (comment)