You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now I'm trying to figure out "Given x a variable which is already an escaped regular expression, how can I combine it with other to-be-escaped parts inside rex() without winding up with a re-escaped version of x in the output?"
I have already spent 20 minutes trying to answer this question and still have gotten nowhere. I would expect this sort of thing to be very common and thus front-and-center, perhaps on the README or on a main vignette.
I dread having to use {rex} because this sort of rabbit hole is the standard outcome of trying to use it. I would really like to use it more because the premise of the package is so appealing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
You are definitely right. We'll try to take a look at this next time we're working on rex. (Pull requests would also definitely be appreciated if you have any available bandwidth!)
I would love to and always hate making a big complaint without being able to contribute much, but I think it would take way more investment to get up speed where I could write good docs.
I am happy to be a guinea pig for reading docs and offering feedback from a noobish perspective, though!
I say this with all due respect, but the documentation for this package is really bad.
I feel like as a user, any question I have about the package turns into a very long expedition to find an answer.
#62, #79, #81 are just a few examples.
Right now I'm trying to figure out "Given
x
a variable which is already an escaped regular expression, how can I combine it with other to-be-escaped parts insiderex()
without winding up with a re-escaped version ofx
in the output?"I have already spent 20 minutes trying to answer this question and still have gotten nowhere. I would expect this sort of thing to be very common and thus front-and-center, perhaps on the README or on a main vignette.
I dread having to use {rex} because this sort of rabbit hole is the standard outcome of trying to use it. I would really like to use it more because the premise of the package is so appealing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: