We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
When we use, use_gpl3_license() the description file does not contain CRAN compliant License: GPL-3 + file LICENSE in description file.
use_gpl3_license()
License: GPL-3 + file LICENSE
Without this feature, when we run R CMD check --as-cran mypackage we get the following NOTE:
R CMD check --as-cran mypackage
* checking top-level files ... NOTE File LICENSE
Having use_gpl3_license() output GPL-3+ file LICENSE in description file would be very helpful similar to the output of use_mit_license()
GPL-3+ file LICENSE
use_mit_license()
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Would you like to fix this in a pull request?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Yes please that would be great.
LICENSE should automatically be added to .Rbuildignore and the existing code looks correct to me.
LICENSE
.Rbuildignore
I consider this fair game for tidyverse dev day. Removing the WIP label.
Question from Cervan: Should I do this for other licenses while I'm working on it?
Answer: Search in Writing R Extensions to see if GPL-3 is the only one that needs this treatment (besides MIT).
f48e100
No branches or pull requests
When we use,
use_gpl3_license()
the description file does not contain CRAN compliantLicense: GPL-3 + file LICENSE
in description file.Without this feature, when we run
R CMD check --as-cran mypackage
we get the following NOTE:Having
use_gpl3_license()
outputGPL-3+ file LICENSE
in description file would be very helpful similar to the output ofuse_mit_license()
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: