-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 227
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Lollipop and dialer integration #31
Comments
I faced this issue. I fixed this issue by commenting the following line in the manifest file. It is resolved. If I am wrong please comment on it. < !-- Call management -- > < receiver < !-- Here filter for protected-broadcasts -- > < intent-filter android:priority="0" > I hope this could be the answer for you question. |
Can you share where this file (path) is? |
It is in AndroidManifest.xml file check for the < !-- Call management -- > then comment it |
Are you suggesting to make the change in the code followed by compile and install on the phone ? I don't have the manifest file on the phone filesystem. |
Yes.. I am asking you to do in the code.. |
@vivekebics, could you please clarify which line did you comment out? What you posted matches exactly the current AndroidManifest.xml. You say "check for the < !-- Call management -- > then comment it", but "" is already a comment, so you likely didn't mean this exact line. Thanks! |
I mean the com.csipsimple.service.OutgoingCall receiver and android.intent.action.NEW_OUTGOING_CALL receiver Thanks! |
@vivekebics, if you don't mind, could you please explain how does this help with the original issue when both native dialer and csipsimple start making calls in parallel? |
Hello,
I have csipsimple on a samsung Note 4 running lollipop 5.1.1. The dialer integration is turned on. When i make a call using the native dialer both the native dialer and the csipsimple make the call. In 4.4 kitkat the native dialer used to reject the call but it seems 5.1.1 work's differently.
Anybody using csipsimple with Lollipop seeing this issue?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: