Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ultimate solution is... #57

Closed
amdad opened this issue Apr 1, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

Ultimate solution is... #57

amdad opened this issue Apr 1, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@amdad
Copy link

amdad commented Apr 1, 2017

I saw... there are Masonry questions here. But, why to ask for Masonry if ultimate freedom of layout solution is Packery.

So? What do you think @rachelandrew Will CSS ever allow us to replace Packery by pure CSS solution. CSS Grid is close to it I think. But CSS Grid is strictly tabular, not so flexible and universal. I just asking. Will W3C ever comes with this kind of full "CSS Auto(placing layout)"? Or JS solution stay only solution for this kind of intelayout?

Thank you Rachel for your work on modernizing web!

@rachelandrew
Copy link
Owner

Packery seems to be about the draggable ability as far as I can see, but I don't know it, so I can't really say one way or the other.

@amdad
Copy link
Author

amdad commented Apr 2, 2017

In my question I didn't mean dragging feature. I asked about packing irregular boxes as tight as it can be without gaps. Logic on CSS Grid is strict. Here is total freedom.

Like CSS Grid with col/row size to be 1px auto repeat. ;)

@rachelandrew
Copy link
Owner

If you have actual use cases then this is already detailed in this thread and in the link issue on the CSS WG github.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants