You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi @radarsu, I've noticed that this library does not explicitly state what license does it use, however according to package.json it is supposed to be GPL-3.0 licensed. This license makes this library essentially useless for any larger project (commercial or not, except for GPL-licensed project obviously), because GPL is considered to be a viral license, forcing the code which uses it (in most cases) to also be licensed using GPL.
Would you consider relicensing your library to a more permissive license, eg. MIT, Apache or BSD-3-clause? Conversely, if this was not your intention to license it as GPL-3.0 (IANAL, but currently your code does not include the required copy of the GPL license), could you please include the desired license text and also update the package.json accordingly?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @radarsu, I've noticed that this library does not explicitly state what license does it use, however according to
package.json
it is supposed to be GPL-3.0 licensed. This license makes this library essentially useless for any larger project (commercial or not, except for GPL-licensed project obviously), because GPL is considered to be a viral license, forcing the code which uses it (in most cases) to also be licensed using GPL.Would you consider relicensing your library to a more permissive license, eg. MIT, Apache or BSD-3-clause? Conversely, if this was not your intention to license it as GPL-3.0 (IANAL, but currently your code does not include the required copy of the GPL license), could you please include the desired license text and also update the package.json accordingly?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: