Allow to define custom serializer for given class #813
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I say 👍 |
| @@ -56,7 +56,9 @@ def format_keys(format) | |||
| attr_reader :key_format | |||
|
|
|||
| def serializer_for(resource, options = {}) | |||
| if resource.respond_to?(:to_ary) | |||
| if resource.respond_to?(:serializer_class) | |||
| resource.serializer_class | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fixed (force pushed a reworked commit)
.. by defining #serializer_class method in serialized object's class. Resolves rails-api#515.
jtomaszewski
force-pushed
the
feature/custom-serializer-class
branch
from
8e6a0e8
to
d8b78a3
Compare
kurko
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2015
…lass Allow to define custom serializer for given class
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
.. by defining #serializer_class method in serialized object's class. Resolves #515.
This is a really small fix and has a test - so I don't see any reasons why it shouldn't be merged.