Statement and sequence numbers aren't correctly parsed when without filling 0 digits

[hapm]

The current regex to parse the statement and sequence numbers doesn't follow the swift specs as declared here.

The examples :28C:235/1 and :28C:235/1 provided in the spec will not match because the regex expects 5 digits for the statement and 3 to 5 digits for the sequence number. The sequence number should be optional and the regex should allow shorter statement and sequence numbers. I would suggest:

/(?<statement_number>\d{1,5})(?:\/(?<sequence_number>\d{1,5}))?/

[bumi]

thanks for raising this. Could you put your suggestion in a PR with an additional test with these examples?
that would be amazing. If it does not break any of the other tests then we can merge and release this.

[hapm]

I'll see if I come to that tomorrow.