Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Retool to use purrr as backend? #47

Open
ramhiser opened this issue Jan 15, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Retool to use purrr as backend? #47

ramhiser opened this issue Jan 15, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@ramhiser
Copy link
Owner

As discussed in #46, having the iterators package as a backend for itertools2 yields slow performance in a few cases. On the other hand, @hadley is on a functional-programming kick (a good thing). Besides, the purrr package is purrrdy sweet and fits the more modern R workflow.

Explore retooling purrr as a backend.
@ramhiser
Copy link
Owner Author

This goes along with #43.

@ramhiser ramhiser mentioned this issue Feb 18, 2017
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@ramhiser