Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inconvenient placement of items in pattern grid processing matrix #1902

Closed
Cydhra opened this issue Jul 23, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Inconvenient placement of items in pattern grid processing matrix #1902

Cydhra opened this issue Jul 23, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Cydhra
Copy link
Contributor

Cydhra commented Jul 23, 2018

What happens:

When trying to create a pattern using the "Processing" option (for external machines), right clicking with a full item stack will place the ghost copy of the full item stack instead of a single item in the matrix.

What you expected to happen:

Since left clicking also places the full item stack, and right clicking with an item stack in a default inventory also just places one item in the slot, it is expected (and would be convenient) when only one item is placed instead. Especially, because clicking once into the grid takes a full item stack from the storage, so it is essentially always the case, that you are trying to create a pattern with a full stack in move.

Steps to reproduce:

  1. Take an item stack
  2. Right click in the processing matrix of the pattern grid
  3. Get a full ghost stack placed instead of one item

Version (make sure you are on the latest version before reporting):

  • Minecraft: 1.12.2
  • Refined Storage: 1.6

(This is an enhancement proposal)

@raoulvdberge raoulvdberge added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 23, 2018
@raoulvdberge
Copy link
Collaborator

This is fixed with new functionality: now a dialog opens when using left/right click to enter an amount manually.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 1, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants