You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When trying to create a pattern using the "Processing" option (for external machines), right clicking with a full item stack will place the ghost copy of the full item stack instead of a single item in the matrix.
What you expected to happen:
Since left clicking also places the full item stack, and right clicking with an item stack in a default inventory also just places one item in the slot, it is expected (and would be convenient) when only one item is placed instead. Especially, because clicking once into the grid takes a full item stack from the storage, so it is essentially always the case, that you are trying to create a pattern with a full stack in move.
Steps to reproduce:
Take an item stack
Right click in the processing matrix of the pattern grid
Get a full ghost stack placed instead of one item
Version (make sure you are on the latest version before reporting):
Minecraft: 1.12.2
Refined Storage: 1.6
(This is an enhancement proposal)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What happens:
When trying to create a pattern using the "Processing" option (for external machines), right clicking with a full item stack will place the ghost copy of the full item stack instead of a single item in the matrix.
What you expected to happen:
Since left clicking also places the full item stack, and right clicking with an item stack in a default inventory also just places one item in the slot, it is expected (and would be convenient) when only one item is placed instead. Especially, because clicking once into the grid takes a full item stack from the storage, so it is essentially always the case, that you are trying to create a pattern with a full stack in move.
Steps to reproduce:
Version (make sure you are on the latest version before reporting):
(This is an enhancement proposal)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: