Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 19, 2023. It is now read-only.

[FEA] Include handling of categorical features in the anomaly detection component. #284

Open
tzemicheal opened this issue Nov 9, 2020 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@tzemicheal
Copy link
Contributor

tzemicheal commented Nov 9, 2020

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Add a method of splitting for a categorical features using bag sampling approach for tree based anomaly detection. Customize the node splitting to handle IP address, port, protocol … etc.

Additional context
This implementation will have dependencies on ExtraTreeRegression implementation of CuML.

@tzemicheal tzemicheal added the feature request New feature or request label Nov 9, 2020
@tzemicheal tzemicheal changed the title [FEA] Include handling categorical features in the anomaly detection module. [FEA] Include handling of categorical features in the anomaly detection component. Nov 9, 2020
@BartleyR BartleyR added this to Issue-Needs prioritizing in v0.17 Release via automation Nov 9, 2020
@BartleyR BartleyR moved this from Issue-Needs prioritizing to Issue-P1 in v0.17 Release Nov 9, 2020
@BartleyR BartleyR removed this from Issue-P1 in v0.17 Release Dec 14, 2020
@BartleyR BartleyR added this to Issue-Needs prioritizing in v0.18 Release via automation Dec 14, 2020
@BartleyR BartleyR moved this from Issue-Needs prioritizing to Issue-P1 in v0.18 Release Dec 14, 2020
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been marked rotten due to no recent activity in the past 90d. Please close this issue if no further response or action is needed. Otherwise, please respond with a comment indicating any updates or changes to the original issue and/or confirm this issue still needs to be addressed.

@fondaing fondaing added this to Issue-Needs prioritizing in v0.19 Release via automation Feb 22, 2021
@fondaing fondaing removed this from Issue-P1 in v0.18 Release Feb 22, 2021
@tzemicheal
Copy link
Contributor Author

tzemicheal commented Feb 22, 2021

This has dependency on this feature request rapidsai/cuml#3063

v0.19 Release automation moved this from Issue-Needs prioritizing to Done Feb 22, 2021
@tzemicheal tzemicheal reopened this Feb 22, 2021
v0.19 Release automation moved this from Done to Issue-Needs prioritizing Feb 22, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been labeled inactive-30d due to no recent activity in the past 30 days. Please close this issue if no further response or action is needed. Otherwise, please respond with a comment indicating any updates or changes to the original issue and/or confirm this issue still needs to be addressed. This issue will be labeled inactive-90d if there is no activity in the next 60 days.

@Nicholas-7 Nicholas-7 added this to Issue-Needs prioritizing in v21.06 Release via automation Apr 9, 2021
@Nicholas-7 Nicholas-7 removed this from Issue-Needs prioritizing in v0.19 Release Apr 9, 2021
@fondaing fondaing removed this from Issue-Needs prioritizing in v21.06 Release Jun 2, 2021
@fondaing fondaing added this to Needs prioritizing in Feature Planning via automation Jun 2, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been labeled inactive-90d due to no recent activity in the past 90 days. Please close this issue if no further response or action is needed. Otherwise, please respond with a comment indicating any updates or changes to the original issue and/or confirm this issue still needs to be addressed.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
Status: No status
Feature Planning
Needs prioritizing
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant