Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updating Python versions #93

Closed
jakirkham opened this issue May 15, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed

Updating Python versions #93

jakirkham opened this issue May 15, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member

As RAPIDS already supports Python 3.11 ( rapidsai/build-planning#3 ), it would be good to test Dask with it as well

Also RAPIDS is planning to add Python 3.12 ( rapidsai/build-planning#40 ), which would be good to start testing for

An open question is when we drop Python 3.9. Both NEP 29 and SPEC 0 recommend dropping it, so maybe that is reasonable to do? This may depend on when RAPIDS and Dask decide to drop it as well

@charlesbluca
Copy link
Member

As RAPIDS already supports Python 3.11 ( rapidsai/build-planning#3 ), it would be good to test Dask with it as well

Yeah it looks like we're publishing 3.11 Dask GPU CI images as of #91, think all that's needed beyond that is actually adding these builds to the matrix in each of the tested Dask repos - can do that now and check if any failures crop up

Both NEP 29 and SPEC 0 recommend dropping it, so maybe that is reasonable to do?

Yeah I'm in favor of the proposal in rapidsai/build-planning#40 to drop 3.9 testing support around the same time that 3.12 is added

@charlesbluca
Copy link
Member

Looks like we already had Distributed's GPU CI running against 3.11 with dask/distributed#8598, opened PRs to do the same for the other Dask repos:

@charlesbluca
Copy link
Member

Looks like 3.11 testing is rolled out everywhere 🎉 @jakirkham is this good to close or would you like to keep this open to track the 3.12 work as it becomes available?

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member Author

Yeah let's close. We can open a new one for Python 3.12 when relevant

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks Charles! 🙏

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants