Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
52 lines (33 loc) · 1.97 KB

project-report-assessment.md

File metadata and controls

52 lines (33 loc) · 1.97 KB

Project Report Assessment

Abstract: 15 pts

  • Is enough information provided get a clear idea about the subject matter?
  • Is the abstract conveying the findings?
  • Are the main points of the report described succinctly?

Introduction: 15 pts

  • Does the introduction cover the required background information to understand the work?
  • Is the introduction well organized: it starts out general and becomes more specific towards the end?
  • Is there a motivation explaining why this project is relevant, important, and/or interesting?

Related Work: 15 pts

  • Is the similar and related work discussed adequately?
  • Are references cited properly (here, but also throughout the whole paper)?
  • Is the a discussion or paragraph on comparing this project with other people's work adequate?

Proposed Method: 25 pts

  • Are there any missing descriptions of symbols used in mathematical notations (if applicable)?
  • Are the main algorithms described well enough so that they can be implemented by a knowledgeable reader?

Experiments: 25 pts

  • Is the experimental setup and methodology described well enough so that it can be repeated?
  • If datasets are used, are they referenced appropriately?

Results and Discussion: 30 pts

  • Are the results described clearly?
  • Is the data analyzed well, and are the results logical?
  • Are the figures clear and have no missing labels?
  • Do the figure captions have sufficient information to understand the figure?
  • Is each figure referenced in the text?
  • Is the discussion critical/honest, and are potential weaknesses/shortcomings are discussed as well?

Conclusions: 15 pts

  • Do the authors describe whether the initial motivation/task was accomplished or not based on the results?
  • Is it discussed adequately how the results relate to previous work?
  • If applicable, are potential future directions given?

Contributions: 10 pts

  • Are all contributions listed clearly?
  • Did each member contribute approximately equally to the project?