-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Vcheck on predicted viral bins #35
Comments
Hi Barbara The output produced by the workflow concatenates the contigs of a bin into one sequence that can be evaluated with CheckV directly - so yes you input that single file with checkV to evaluate the quality of the predicted viral bin :-) Best, |
Hello Joachim, Thank you, |
Hello Guowei Like with bacterial MAGs, the sequential order of the contigs in a viral bin/viral MAG is not known. Unless you find a reference genome to guide how to put the genome/contigs puzzle together, even though mosaicism in viruses may hinder this effort. The contigs are, by choice, not connected by gaps like "XXX" or some other accepted DNA character in fasta-files as it might mess up the viral evaluation machinery of CheckV. Best, |
No activity on this one, closing it. |
I got a single Concatenated predicted viral bin from RF model in resultsdir/vamb_bins. Do I input this single file in checkV? How would checkV know which contigs belong to the same bin (or does that now matter at this stage?)
Thank you
Barbara
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: