You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The code indicates that straight-use-package is intended to return successfully after doing nothing, when passed a built-in package. There are some built-in packages where this is not the case.
Well, if you look in M-x find-library finder-inf, Emacs seems to say that those features are features but not packages. (Just because you have a feature named foo doesn't mean there has to be a package named foo; the file foo.el is still supposed to have the packaging header either way.) Is there a reason you expect packages by those names to exist, like a Package-Requires header that depends on them?
Packages available from recipe repositories always override built-in packages. This is because for example we don't want the Emacs-provided obsolete version of Org to be considered adequate to satisfy a dependency on Org.
What's wrong
The code indicates that
straight-use-package
is intended to return successfully after doing nothing, when passed a built-in package. There are some built-in packages where this is not the case.Directions to reproduce
Version information
Emacs version:
GNU Emacs 26.1 (build 2, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.5) of 2019-09-23, modified by Debian
Operating system:
Linux d 4.9.0-8-amd64 Move FIXME notices into Github issues #1 SMP Debian 4.9.130-2 (2018-10-27) x86_64 GNU/Linux
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: