We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Core(TM) i5+8400: https://github.com/rcmaehl/WhyNotWin11/blob/main/includes/SupportedProcessorsIntel.txt#L68 Core(TM) i5+8500: https://github.com/rcmaehl/WhyNotWin11/blob/main/includes/SupportedProcessorsIntel.txt#L69
I might be wrong about these specific models somehow, but I've never seen Intel Core CPU models with +'s instead of -'s like this.
This appears to be because of a mistake on Microsofts part and not yours since they are also listed with +'s at https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/design/minimum/supported/windows-11-supported-intel-processors
And seems to have first appeared in the Win 10 1709 CPU list: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/design/minimum/supported/windows-10-1709-supported-intel-processors
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
8d42f46
rcmaehl
No branches or pull requests
Core(TM) i5+8400: https://github.com/rcmaehl/WhyNotWin11/blob/main/includes/SupportedProcessorsIntel.txt#L68
Core(TM) i5+8500: https://github.com/rcmaehl/WhyNotWin11/blob/main/includes/SupportedProcessorsIntel.txt#L69
I might be wrong about these specific models somehow, but I've never seen Intel Core CPU models with +'s instead of -'s like this.
This appears to be because of a mistake on Microsofts part and not yours since they are also listed with +'s at https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/design/minimum/supported/windows-11-supported-intel-processors
And seems to have first appeared in the Win 10 1709 CPU list: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/design/minimum/supported/windows-10-1709-supported-intel-processors
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: