You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Posted on Apr 13, 2011 by Happy Bear
When listing large files (over 4GB) which have been archived with rdiffbackup, an incorrect filesize is reported by rdiff-backup-fs - smaller than the real filesize. (It was 1.9GB in my test).
I tried this on Ubuntu 10.10, 32 bit.
I know there was a fix changing the integer used to hold the filesize to long long, but it still does not seem to work. Maybe it does work on a 64 bit operating system?
Otherwise rdiff-backup-fs is great, thanks to the developer!
Comment #1
Posted on Apr 13, 2011 by Happy Rhino
Yes, that was a very quick fix in hope, that it would be enough. Obviously it wasn't, so I'll try to provide a better fix this time. I am closing the issue on archfs web page too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
from the original google code page below:
Posted on Apr 13, 2011 by Happy Bear
When listing large files (over 4GB) which have been archived with rdiffbackup, an incorrect filesize is reported by rdiff-backup-fs - smaller than the real filesize. (It was 1.9GB in my test).
I tried this on Ubuntu 10.10, 32 bit.
I know there was a fix changing the integer used to hold the filesize to long long, but it still does not seem to work. Maybe it does work on a 64 bit operating system?
Otherwise rdiff-backup-fs is great, thanks to the developer!
Comment #1
Posted on Apr 13, 2011 by Happy Rhino
Yes, that was a very quick fix in hope, that it would be enough. Obviously it wasn't, so I'll try to provide a better fix this time. I am closing the issue on archfs web page too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: