You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The 4.77MHz 8086 was rated to have an execution speed of 0.33 MIPS (330 KIPS) and the 10 MHz 8086 was rated at 0.75 MIPS, (750 KIPS) [1]. This means that Libra should be sped up by ~7-16 times.
For reference, Virgo's execution speed is ~13.0 KIPS (~3.7 times slower than Libra.)
The Virgo and libra numbers were calculated using the print_numbers.asm file in the gui branch.
Running in release mode on Win32 I am able to produce ~200 KIPS by skipping the prints to screen using step over print_num.
Bottleneck is my CPU: i5 3570k, using only 1 of 4 cores. If we can split the work onto multiple cores exceeding 8086 execution speed may be sooner than expected.
I'm not sure that there's a way to parallelize the execution of the programs. They are written for a single core, and each step must be executed linearly.
The GUI updates should already be in a separate thread, although that should be confirmed.
Current speed is approximately ~47.5 KIPS.
The 4.77MHz 8086 was rated to have an execution speed of 0.33 MIPS (330 KIPS) and the 10 MHz 8086 was rated at 0.75 MIPS, (750 KIPS) [1]. This means that Libra should be sped up by ~7-16 times.
For reference, Virgo's execution speed is ~13.0 KIPS (~3.7 times slower than Libra.)
The Virgo and libra numbers were calculated using the print_numbers.asm file in the gui branch.
[1] http://lowendmac.com/lowendpc/tech/8086.shtml
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: