Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

73 validity checks for edit #83

Merged
merged 59 commits into from Nov 5, 2019
Merged

73 validity checks for edit #83

merged 59 commits into from Nov 5, 2019

Conversation

b-boehne
Copy link
Contributor

@b-boehne b-boehne commented Oct 9, 2019

comparison with improve-exception-handling to not see Kevins changes which i merged in my branch to use his error handling

will of course merge to master after approval

Bibob7 and others added 27 commits September 24, 2019 16:24
Copy link
Contributor

@swenzel swenzel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think for now this is good, but in future we might want to use a more powerful validator. Like https://github.com/23andMe/Yamale for example.

esque/resources/topic.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@b-boehne
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think for now this is good, but in future we might want to use a more powerful validator. Like https://github.com/23andMe/Yamale for example.

damn I reinvented the wheel again, this is perfect for our use case
are you sure we don't want to use yamale from the get-go? i'd be willing to do it

@swenzel swenzel requested a review from hfjn November 5, 2019 13:11
@swenzel swenzel merged commit b543992 into master Nov 5, 2019
@swenzel swenzel deleted the 73-validity-checks-for-edit branch November 5, 2019 14:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants