Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Intuition of order of association #19

Open
lunaryle opened this issue Jul 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Intuition of order of association #19

lunaryle opened this issue Jul 22, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@lunaryle
Copy link

lunaryle commented Jul 22, 2024

Hi @realgump, thank you for your great work mvmhat.
When you apply multi view tracking with single view trackers,
you applied spatial association first(at frame_matching() and deep_sort/linear_assignment.py).
What is the intuition of applying spatial association first? Would this setting be appropriate for non-overlapping camera settings, too?
I wonder if you have experimented ablation study regarding the order of association.

@realgump
Copy link
Owner

In my opinion, the tracking problem is typically an online task. For time-synchronized cameras, at time 0, there is only one frame from each camera. Therefore, we must apply spatial association and assign an ID to each person to initialize their tracklet. At time t > 0, as described in Algorithm 1, Lines 6-9 of Self-supervised Multi-view Multi-Human Association and Tracking, we first apply temporal association, followed by spatial association.

Any person unmatched during spatial association will be assigned a new ID, thus the algorithm suitable for non-overlapping camera settings as well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants