We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently, due to strict check when registering schemas RLMSchema.mm:95 only immediate subclasses of RLMObject are being registered.
RLMSchema.mm:95
RLMObject
It makes it somewhat tricky to share common functionality between model classes (e.g. serialization).
Considering there is an explicit comment regarding direct subclasses, I assumed there must be a reason for this. Could you elaborate on it please?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Closing as a duplicate of #652
Sorry, something went wrong.
This should now be possible on master with #940
No branches or pull requests
Currently, due to strict check when registering schemas
RLMSchema.mm:95
only immediate subclasses ofRLMObject
are being registered.It makes it somewhat tricky to share common functionality between model classes (e.g. serialization).
Considering there is an explicit comment regarding direct subclasses, I assumed there must be a reason for this. Could you elaborate on it please?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: