New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Detect and escalate NFS 'root_squash' (or other permission related problems) to the user #158
Comments
Another point of interest is NFSv4 is not properly supported within rear at this moment. E.g. read the background details at http://blather.michaelwlucas.com/archives/796 Crossed this while doing a recovery exercise using RBME and restoring over NFSv4 (on fedora 18 beta): |
I want to upvote to handle the NFSv4! Because it becomes more and more the standard version for NFS. In our case we put in place ReaR as system backup tool for our RHEL5 servers. For that we already had to adapt the NFS server to allow the RHEL5 mount the share in version 3. But now we get also RHEL6 that we need to backup. And since RHEL6 the default version used by the client is also v4! Regards, |
@xenlo You mean adding an rpc.idmapd service to the rescue image ? It is already possible to add it yourself to the configuration file and have it started on boot. Integrating this into Relax-and-Recover should be quite easy. |
Yes - please get nfsv4 working. We cannot standardize on any other versions of NFS for security reasons. Currently, a good number of ReaR images are failing because of this. If not support, please post a workaround until supported. |
a work-around is |
NFSv4 support post-pone to rear-1.18 release |
Fully NFSv4 integration into rear is postponed to 1.19. No time left for 1.18 release. |
We may close this issue as we have a special issue #754 for this topic. |
When the user has no rights to write to the destination folder (as root), we should detect and report this to the user. Causes could be NFS root_squash, read_only mounts and/or selinux.
If possible, we should analyse the permission problems and provide guidance for each specific case. Or if impossible, at least report the various causes for this issue.
This closes #146.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: